ASET-HERDSA 2000 Main Page
[ Abstracts ] [ Program ] [ Proceedings ] [ ASET-HERDSA 2000 Main ]

Supporting individual and collective staff development in computer based work through collaborative action research or what's at stake in CALL and syllabus integration?

Gavin Melles
Faculty of Education, Deakin University



In current writing and practice on teacher development action research has something of the status of a cliche although collaborative research paradigms investigating educational technology in the curriculum have a much more limited history than in other areas of the action research literature. In general, principles and procedures for planning and implementing action cycles in educational circles vary through individualist and collaborative frameworks and degrees of 'expert' control. Participatory models aim to build on negotiation within a community to enhance the quality of research and professional outcomes in ways that avoid both individualism and external control or facilitation. The question I address in this paper is what is at stake for personal and group development to take place for teachers beyond framing research in a group context. What policy and personal factors help determine the implementation of technology enhanced curriculum? What procedures and definitions are necessary (if any) to engage in supporting change for a technology enhanced curriculum?

This paper looks at the nature of collaboration, and the processes and outcomes of research on integrating computer based activities in the ESL curriculum through the texts of four ESL teachers (including the author). The paper highlights the need for flexibility in interpreting and implementing action research paradigms in contexts where personal and institutional boundaries and obstacles strongly determine the directions and narratives we adopt. NUD*IST 4.0 is used to map key discourse items in the narrative of the semester long project and individual extracts from transcripts illustrate critical moments in the cycles of investigation where research process, definitions, and links with curriculum are explored and questioned by participants. I conclude by questioning the efficacy and utility of methodologies that strongly prescribe procedure and principle in the absence of a clear understanding of the personal, social, and institutional settings of teacher research.

Contact person: Gavin Melles. Email: Cegbm@twp.ac.nz
Voice: +64 7834 8892 Fax: +64 7838 8858

Please cite as: Melles, G. (2000). Supporting individual and collective staff development in computer based work through collaborative action research or what's at stake in CALL and syllabus integration? In Flexible Learning for a Flexible Society, Proceedings of ASET-HERDSA 2000 Conference. Toowoomba, Qld, 2-5 July. ASET and HERDSA. http://cleo.murdoch.edu.au/gen/aset/confs/aset-herdsa2000/abstracts/melles-abs.html



[ Abstracts ] [ Program ] [ Proceedings ] [ ASET-HERDSA 2000 Main ]
Created 13 June 2000. Last revised: 13 June 2000. HTML: Roger Atkinson [atkinson@cleo.murdoch.edu.au]
This URL: http://cleo.murdoch.edu.au/gen/aset/confs/aset-herdsa2000/abstracts/melles-abs.html